Read this if you are looking at implementing a new Electronic Health Records (EHR) system.
Not since the early years of the meaningful use incentives have we seen such client activity in implementing new EHR systems. The primary driver for this activity is a strong desire to move away from combinations of multiple different EHR vendors across a health system toward a single, integrated EHR platform from one vendor. Continuity of care, population health, and patient-centric data are trumping a strategy of having niche EHR platforms at the department or care-setting level. Implementing an integrated EHR across an entire health system is a big, ambitious, high-risk project that comes with significant change for your people—even under normal conditions.
Conditions have been far from normal for most workforces over the past few years. After three years of the COVID-19 pandemic, exhausting work conditions, and the unusual labor market (commonly referred to as the "Great Resignation"), staffing challenges are understandably at an all-time high.
It is no surprise then, that when we ask clients what some of their top project risks are heading into an implementation, staffing is listed as their number one or two risk. And staffing is not just a risk for clients. EHR vendors are also facing increased employee attrition.
So, when you combine very large and high-risk projects capable of changing every process for your people with a labor market full of turnover and vacancies, you have a higher risk EHR implementation environment than at any time in recent memory.
This environment may lead you to think that now isn’t a good time to implement a new system. At times, waiting on the implementation may be the right call for your organization. Maybe you should hang tight for a bit and wait until your team is more stable.
However, it may not be best to wait. Staying with a combination of legacy EHRs bolted together may not reduce your organizational risk. As viable legacy EHRs are dwindling, the chance that a change in EHR will be forced upon your health system increases. Replacing a system under duress, rather than choosing when to implement a new EHR system, would actually be more stressful and most likely introduce even more risk.
If you are planning to or are currently implementing a new EHR in these workforce conditions, here are some recommendations to help mitigate staffing and vendor risks and manage, if not strengthen, employee well-being.
Vendor turnover
- Negotiate provisions
During contract negotiations, address turnover and vacancies directly. Contractual terms for notification, transition plans, and timelines for filling vacancies won’t prevent turnover but will make it more manageable when it occurs.
- Meeting summaries
Direct the vendor to use a consistent meeting summary format and post it to a project portal within a set period of time; this can also help the transition from one vendor teammate to another.
- Executive sponsor notice
Require the vendor to provide notice to your executive sponsor as soon as the vendor knows about staff turnover. This allows leadership to be prepared for the news and lead their team through the staffing transition calmly and from an informed position.
- Transition plan and call
Have vendors document a written transition plan and hold a transition call between the client and vendor resources. This can’t be accomplished with sudden departures but can be with planned departures.
- Timeline provisions
Vendor staffing disruption can be a project risk and can negatively impact implementation timelines. Negotiate timeline change provisions to limit the negative impact on your health system if a vendor encounters staffing turnover.
Health system turnover
- Change management
Focus on deliberate, intentional, and proactive change management. Active and visible sponsorship for the change will help your employees embrace the change to the new EHR. By making the new EHR more exciting and less daunting, it will give employees one less reason to seek employment elsewhere.
- Have contingency and management reserves
From a project management perspective, increasing your contingency funds and management reserves can help you account for a higher likelihood of staff turnover, more recruiting, or staff augmentation, if needed.
- Establish staff augmentation arrangements in advance
Identify firms for staff augmentation before you start. Know who you will call to get the talent you need when you need it. Having expectations of contracted rates in advance can help you fill vacancies more quickly.
- Use your senior team as your coaching staff
Some leaders and managers will find an implementation more stressful than others, decreasing their effectiveness as team leaders. Assigning senior leaders to different department heads to serve as coaches and mentors can give managers the support they need to get through the implementation.
- Address weak leaders before the implementation
In a tough labor market, you may be reluctant to address your weaker leaders for fear of not being able to replace them. Our experience is that implementations don’t often make weak leaders stronger, and their weaknesses will hinder the project. You’ll need to determine if you can coach them up, make the tough call to replace them, or find a leader within their team to step up for the implementation.
- Negotiate delay provisions
While not as easy to negotiate as vendor staff turnover delays, having a defined process for changing the timeline if you need to can be helpful. Provisions of this nature can help you manage the risk and know in advance what will happen if you were to delay the project.
- Monitor for the non-project turnover
Often implementations will have a staffing and turnover plan for people on the project. However, a less obvious staffing risk is turnover of people in departments not assigned to the project. Those turnovers tend to put more non-project work on project team members. Having a plan to resolve vacancies quickly will help you reduce this risk.
- Have job descriptions ready
In order to speed up the process to address turnover and vacancies, have job descriptions ready. This can allow you to go to market faster when (not if) you have turnover during the implementation.
Employee well-being
Large-scale, complex initiatives can place new strains on employees, leading to greater levels of stress, and in some cases, employee burnout. By taking a proactive approach to supporting well-being (physical, mental, social, financial, and professional), the organization can better manage the performance, retention, and interpersonal dynamics of the project team. This can help reduce the risk of project delays and improve overall project outcomes.
- Prepare people for what to expect
A large system implementation can be a source of concern and uncertainty. Employees may worry about how the change will affect their jobs and what will be expected of them. There may be fears around how these expectations will impact other personal and professional commitments. Transparency, proactive planning, and an individualized approach can help alleviate fears and reduce stress and uncertainty.
- Unite project leadership at all levels
Inconsistent messaging and decision-making can quickly undermine trust and may trigger cynicism, disengagement, and even animosity. It is imperative that executives and team leaders share a common understanding of project goals, guiding principles, and core organizational values around well-being—and communicate that understanding to the team.
- Be intentional about trust
Trust is a core element of well-being that is built upon authenticity, empathy, and credibility. Make sure to make trust a part of the project as it is also the foundation for the collaboration necessary among the organization, vendor, and implementation partner.
- Pulse surveys (Stay in tune with how people are doing)
Workload demands will shift throughout the implementation. At the same time, personal circumstances of employees will evolve. Maintaining a “pulse” on how the team is doing and being able to quickly respond when teams or individual contributors are struggling can help project leaders and managers stay ahead of disengagement, burnout, and resignation.
- Celebrate success and show appreciation
It can be easy to miss opportunities to celebrate milestones and recognize individual contributors when timelines are tight, and workloads are high. We emphasize the importance of appreciation, celebration, and finding moments for fun throughout the project.
- Support for stress management and resilience
Often, there are opportunities to help staff improve stress management with practical, research-supported activities, such as five-minute breathing exercises, stretch breaks, and environmental changes (brief walking breaks and outdoor meetings, for example) to support stress regulation.
- Highlight wellness and well-being resources
Employees may benefit from existing wellness and well-being resources throughout the project. There may be opportunities to work with human resources or a well-being manager to increase awareness for these resources or design custom programming in support of the project.
- Promote healthy lifestyle choices
Implementations are often synonymous with long hours sitting in meetings or at a screen, “always-on” mentalities, and team donuts, pizzas, and bowls of candy. While these behaviors (and tasty treats) may offer short-term benefits, they degrade employee resilience and well-being over time. Small behavioral nudges can make a big difference, such as replacing (or at least supplementing) typical “command center treats“ with healthier options, emphasizing breaks (both throughout the day and PTO), and agreeing to off-hours communication expectations and boundaries.
It takes strong ambition to take on a large EHR project in normal times. Under the current staffing stresses, it is crucial to be prepared. If you plan in advance for vendor and employee turnover, manage your people deliberately, and focus on employee well-being and change management, you can reduce the risk and increase the likelihood of a successful outcome.