Skip to Main Content

In a move that has sparked widespread attention across higher education, the US Department of Education (ED) recently placed Harvard University on Heightened Cash Monitoring (HCM) status. This designation is typically reserved for institutions facing serious financial or administrative challenges. While Harvard’s inclusion may come as a surprise, the decision underscores the importance of understanding the HCM framework and its implications for colleges and universities nationwide. 

Changes are brewing in the healthcare industry due to far-reaching federal reforms. With the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA) now signed into law—alongside Executive Orders (EO), judicial rulings, and other federal actions—providers are facing a wave of new requirements and opportunities. This article highlights some of the changes affecting the industry and offers a comprehensive, downloadable summary for a closer look at key impacts.

A new Executive Order issued by President Donald Trump on August 7, 2025, brings major changes to how federal agencies handle discretionary grants. Titled "Improving Oversight of Federal Grantmaking," the changes in this Order introduce more political oversight, tighter controls on how funds are used, and new compliance rules that will directly affect organizations receiving federal funding. 

The One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA) introduces sweeping reforms to federal student aid programs, reshaping the financial landscape for higher education institutions and their students. From changes in loan borrowing limits and repayment structures to Pell Grant eligibility and institutional accountability, the OBBBA signals a new era of fiscal discipline and transparency in postsecondary education.

As financial institutions continue to navigate evolving regulatory landscapes, the recently enacted OBBBA legislation introduces a noteworthy incentive aimed at supporting rural and agricultural development. Effective July 4, 2025, the bill provides a 25% federal income tax exemption on interest income earned from qualifying rural or agricultural real estate loans.  

Signed into law by President Trump on July 4, 2025, the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA) marks a significant step forward in addressing America’s growing need for affordable housing. With the demand for low-cost units far outpacing supply nationwide, the legislation offers targeted solutions aimed at making development more feasible and sustainable.

On July 4, 2025, the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA) was signed into law. This article summarizes relevant key provisions that impact tax-exempt organizations. 

On July 1, 2025, Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) and Rural Health Clinics (RHCs) transitioned from cost report-based to claim-based Medicare reimbursement for influenza, pneumococcal, COVID-19, and Hepatitis B vaccines. This important policy change enables real-time payment, improving cash flow and making vaccine administration more financially viable for health centers and clinics. 

Tariffs remain a significant cost factor for US importers and exporters. Understanding and leveraging trade programs is more critical than ever. One underutilized but highly valuable strategic tool is duty drawback. 

The "Big Beautiful Bill" introduces a new savings vehicle for American families called the Trump Account. This novel provision has largely been overshadowed by other headline items including the SALT cap—and perhaps understandably so. This article will explain what these accounts are, how they would work, and their tax implications, so that if the legislation passes, you can be informed on whether they fit into your family's financial future.

Newly appointed to lead BerryDunn’s Healthcare Practice Group, Lisa Trundy-Whitten is closely attuned to the healthcare industry. From challenges faced by healthcare organizations to the solutions BerryDunn’s experts can provide, Lisa shares her vision for the team as she takes the helm, as well as thoughtful insights for today’s healthcare leaders. 

The debate and negotiations over tax reform are taking shape in the United States Congress. The United States Senate is reviewing the ‘One Big Beautiful Bill Act’ (OBBBA) passed by the US House of Representatives in late May. The House-passed legislation contains meaningful tax reforms with potentially significant impact to businesses and individuals.

In the complex world of international trade, businesses are constantly seeking ways to optimize their supply chains and reduce costs. One often-overlooked strategy that can yield significant savings is the use of first sale declarations.  

Nonprofit leaders must assess the risks and strategically position their organizations to adapt to changing funding landscapes. This article outlines key steps to help your organization proactively evaluate funding vulnerabilities, mitigate risks, and plan for sustainable operations. 

The proposed “One Big Beautiful Bill Act” includes several provisions that would directly impact tax-exempt organizations. BerryDunn’s experts provide a breakdown of how the bill could affect nonprofits.

The proposed $880 billion cuts to Medicaid, along with recently imposed tariffs and funding freezes, have placed healthcare organizations directly in the crosshairs of federal funding reductions. The result is an unprecedented threat that would profoundly affect the financial stability of organizations providing care.

After an intense overnight session, the US House of Representatives narrowly passed the "One Big Beautiful Bill Act" with a 215-214 vote, marking a significant milestone in fiscal policy reform. The bill, which now heads to the Senate for further consideration, proposes extensive tax changes alongside broader regulatory shifts. While House Republicans and the current administration champion the bill as a legislative victory, Democratic opposition remains strong, and modifications are expected before it reaches the president’s desk.

With default federal student loan collections now resumed by the Department of Education, higher education institutions and other effected nonprofits need a strategy to ensure compliance. 

In today's globalized economy, businesses face an ever-changing landscape of tariffs, trade policies, and international supply chain challenges. For companies navigating these complexities, foreign trade zones (FTZs) present a strategic opportunity to reduce costs, improve logistical efficiency, and enhance overall competitiveness. 

As new regulations take shape and tariff frameworks continue to change, importers must assess their compliance strategies with heightened scrutiny. One of the most critical components of this evaluation is transfer pricing. 

Most nonprofits rely on federal and state government funds to fulfill their missions. With a federal funding freeze in the headlines, many clients are asking us how they can best prepare for a freeze and protect their organizations if funding is cut. Here are three steps you can take today to stay ahead. 

For manufacturers in New England, the global trade environment has always played a significant role in shaping supply chain strategies and cost structures. With the current tariff landscape marked by rapid changes and adjustments due to ongoing trade negotiations and economic strategies, businesses must be ready to quickly reevaluate their pricing models and material cost standards to maintain profitability. 

In a move that has sparked widespread attention across higher education, the US Department of Education (ED) recently placed Harvard University on Heightened Cash Monitoring (HCM) status. This designation is typically reserved for institutions facing serious financial or administrative challenges. While Harvard’s inclusion may come as a surprise, the decision underscores the importance of understanding the HCM framework and its implications for colleges and universities nationwide. 

What is Heightened Cash Monitoring (HCM)?

HCM is a regulatory mechanism used by ED to increase oversight of institutions participating in federal Title IV financial aid programs. There are two levels of HCM: 

  • HCM1: Institutions must disburse federal aid to students using their own funds first, then submit disbursement records to ED. 
  • HCM2: A more stringent level, requiring institutions to submit detailed documentation for each student before receiving reimbursement. This includes student eligibility, disbursement records, and confirmation of credit balance payments. 

Institutions may be placed on HCM due to concerns about financial responsibility, administrative capability, audit findings, accreditation issues, or other compliance problems. The goal is to monitor institutions to determine whether federal student aid is awarded and disbursed appropriately.  

When an institution is placed under HCM, institutions can be faced with operational burdens such as: 

  • Using institutional funds to cover federal aid disbursements upfront 
  • Experiencing delays in being reimbursed for the federal disbursements covered with operational funds 
  • Posting a letter of credit as financial collateral may be required 
  • Undergoing increased scrutiny from ED, including periodic reviews and documentation audits 

These requirements can impact student services, financial aid processing, and institutional reputation. 

To be removed from HCM, institutions must: 

  • Resolve the underlying issues by taking actions such as submitting overdue audits, improving financial metrics, or addressing compliance violations. 
  • Demonstrate sustained compliance with Title IV regulations. 
  • Maintain transparent and timely reporting to ED. 
  • In some cases, undergo a probationary period before full reinstatement to the advance payment method. 

The process is rigorous and can take months or even years, depending on the severity of the issues. 

How higher ed institutions can mitigate the risk of HCM

HCM is a powerful tool for federal oversight, designed to apply accountability and protect public funds. While some have questioned the rationale behind Harvard’s HCM designation, the broader framework of HCM remains a key component of ED’s oversight. The following are key areas where institutions can focus and take proactive steps to mitigate their risk of HCM designation:

1. Maintain strong financial health
Institutions should prioritize maintaining a Federal Financial Responsibility Composite Score above 1.5, as calculated by ED. This score reflects the overall financial health of an institution and is a key indicator used in HCM evaluations. Institutions should also avoid taking on excessive long-term borrowings without clear repayment strategies and maintain long-term borrowing levels relative to an institution’s revenue streams. Additionally, institutions should make certain of accurate and timely filings of their audited financial statements.

2. Maintain effective administrative operations
Operational efficiency and regulatory compliance go hand in hand. Institutions should provide adequate training to all financial aid staff members, avoid turnover in key financial aid positions, and promptly address any audit findings. Delays in disbursement or reconciliation of federal funds can trigger red flags during ED reviews. Investing in robust administrative systems and staff training can help institutions stay ahead of potential issues.

3. Monitor compliance and risk indicators
Institutions should conduct regular internal reviews of Title IV funds, including policies and procedures to address compliance with all federal regulations. Institutions should respond promptly to inquiries from the Federal Government. Maintaining good standing with accrediting bodies not only supports eligibility for federal aid but also signals institutional integrity to students and the public.

Strategic Insights for higher education institutions

BerryDunn offers a wide range of assurance and consulting services to meet the specific needs of higher education institutions. We focus on building strong client relationships that stand the test of time, helping colleges and universities minimize risk and maximize efficiencies. Learn more about our team and services.

Article
Understanding Heightened Cash Monitoring: Implications for Colleges and Universities

Assuring access to behavioral health services in rural communities remains one of the most persistent and critical challenges that state governments face today. Research shows that nearly 18% of large rural areas and over 40% of small or isolated rural areas are at least 30 minutes away from any mental health care facility. In comparison, fewer than 10% of urban areas face this issue. According to Rural Health Information Hub, over 70% of rural counties lack a psychiatrist, and many have no psychologists or licensed counselors. Rural communities often struggle to access behavioral health services, which can harm community well-being, economic stability, and family life. 

Most rural communities also lack reliable public transportation, which makes it difficult for people without personal vehicles to access behavioral health services and support. Even for those with personal vehicles, costs related to fuel, insurance, and vehicle maintenance can be prohibitive for low-income households. Based on our experience and observations in rural communities, many people rely on family and friends for rides, which can be an inconsistent resource and may compromise privacy or people’s willingness to access services.  

Many individuals in rural communities are also unaware of treatment options or where to seek behavioral health services and support. Behavioral health services are often poorly advertised. In addition, our experience shows that rural communities tend to prefer receiving information through word of mouth, relying on trusted neighbors, friends, and local leaders to share news about available services. 

Misconceptions about behavioral health services persist in many rural communities and in small communities where “everyone knows everyone.” Based on our experience, people may avoid seeking help due to stigma around mental health and fear of being judged, especially when behavioral health services are visibly located within the community. Rural culture often emphasizes self-reliance, which can discourage help-seeking behavior and reinforces the belief that mental health challenges should be managed privately.  

The areas below highlight essential steps to help promote access, strengthen collaboration, and increase awareness of behavioral health services in rural communities. 

Expand transportation access 

Transportation is a critical barrier for many rural residents. To help expand transportation access, consider the following: 

  • Add or increase reimbursement rates for transportation providers to incentivize them to operate in rural communities. 
  • Research and stay apprised of any new funding sources (e.g., Rural Health Information Hub) to support expanded transportation options.  
  • Partner with local transit agencies, non-profits, and community organizations to coordinate rideshare programs, volunteer driver networks, or shuttle services tailored to behavioral health appointments. 

Expanding transportation services—whether through partnerships, subsidies, or new infrastructure—can significantly improve access to care and support. 

Improve how information is shared 

Clear and consistent communication is essential to increase awareness of available behavioral health services and begin to destigmatize mental health treatment. To help improve information dissemination, consider the following: 

  • Establish or reinforce partnerships with local and national organizations and advocacy groups to develop a communication plan and design and implement effective awareness campaigns that inform the public of available behavioral health services.  
  • Partner with trusted local leaders (e.g., faith leader, fire marshal, sheriff) to help deliver messages that challenge mental health stigma and promote accessing services.  
  • Host town halls and/or community forums to address concerns about behavioral health facilities and services.  
  • Establish and actively manage a centralized inbox where rural community members can submit questions, concerns, or feedback about behavioral health services. Ensure timely responses and track recurring themes to inform outreach and service improvements. 
  • Share data and success stories about how behavioral health services improve community well-being, reduce usage of emergency services, and support economic stability.  
  • Be transparent about safety protocols, service populations, and facility operations in rural communities to counter misinformation.   

Through these partnerships, states can help ensure that rural community members are informed of available resources and begin to destigmatize mental health. 

Create a centralized and accessible resource directory 

Developing an electronic directory of available behavioral health programs and services can help people in rural communities easily find the support they need and increase participation in behavioral health. To help people access the services they need, consider the following: 

  • Develop a single, multilingual, and ADA-compliant directory of available programs and services, including crisis lines, outpatient clinics, telehealth options, peer support, and culturally-specific services.  
  • Distribute the directory both online and as paper copies in accessible places such as libraries, clinics, hospitals, schools, churches, food banks, and community centers to reach a wider audience.  
  • Include eligibility criteria, hours of operation, and contact information for each service to reduce confusion and increase follow-through. 
  • Update the directory regularly and include a feedback mechanism, so users can report outdated information or suggest new resources. 
  • Promote the directory through local media, social networks, and community events to raise awareness and encourage use. 
  • Partner with local organizations and leaders to co-brand and distribute the directory, increasing trust and credibility within the community. 
  • Aim to make the directory easy to navigate and accessible to all. 

At BerryDunn, our State Government Practice Group has a proven record of helping clients overcome these barriers. We combine robust data analysis, strategic assessment, and stakeholder engagement to deliver tailored, actionable recommendations that drive measurable improvements. Our experts have guided multiple states through the design and implementation of initiatives that help expand access and support improved outcomes. Contact our behavioral health consulting team to discover how we can partner with you to ensure healthier, more resilient rural communities.   

Article
Bridging the gap: improving behavioral health services in rural communities

When you hear the word “policies,” does it fill you with exhilaration and joy? No? Well, if unbridled enthusiasm isn’t your initial response, then I hope you will benefit from an increased understanding of the purpose and value of well-crafted policies after reading this article.  

Compliance policy doesn’t have a great reputation. We often picture a thick policy and procedures manual in a dusty three-ring binder that might as well be buried in a time capsule given how infrequently they are referenced. But it doesn’t have to be this way! 

Your compliance policies should be living documents that guide daily activities for many staff members. To be effective, they must be clear, concise, and appropriately specific. 

Compliance policy: Find the right balance 

Formal policies and procedures can also vary greatly in how prescriptive they are and in how much actual guidance they provide.  While variety is fine, extremes can be problematic.  

Recently, I was researching a particular policy and looking for good examples. As I dove into the first one, the page numbers flew by—30 pages worth, including verbatim text of federal regulations. Bleary-eyed, I moved on to another example. 

This second one took me a few minutes—and a fair amount of zooming in—to find. Two brief paragraphs. Hmm, did I miss another section somewhere? Nope. This organization decided it wasn’t really necessary to say much of anything about how they would be managing millions of federal dollars. 

What’s the takeaway? While the minimalist approach is concerning, neither example really aligns policy with the actual necessary and compliant activities organizations must perform. 

Policies should NOT be written to cover every possible contingency in explicit long form. Why is that? Because few will read them, and unfortunately, that means even fewer will follow them. A policy manual is ACTUALLY supposed to be read, understood, followed, and frequently referenced. And when a provision should be changed, it can be modified to ensure it is both compliant and accurate. 

Practical guidelines for compliance policy 

  1. Make sure your policy manual is accessible, searchable, and readable: Everyone in the organization needs to be able to understand it. 

  1. Read your existing policy manuals: If that idea makes you cringe, strongly consider modifying your policy because chances are, few are reading it or using it as a reference tool. 

  1. Perform random tests by observing or talking through key processes to determine if policy is being followed: Whether the result is yes or no, figure out the reason(s) behind the answers. It is difficult to improve the policy unless you find out the why. (And remember, just because a policy is being followed, that doesn’t mean it is the best way for the organization to operate.) 

  1. Break up the typical annual policy review by performing a staggered review of individual sections on a rolling basis throughout the year: In this manner, there will be better focus, engagement, and consequently improved results. 

  1. Do you have a policy on policies?: That may sound like an unserious question, but it isn’t. There should be a statement about how your organization writes, handles, and changes its policies. 

Bring pure exhilaration to your organization’s policy manual by continually matching policy to the needs of your organization, not only to stay compliant, but also to operate with the best efficiencies and outcomes. NOTE: Results may vary. You may not experience pure exhilaration, but syncing your policies with your organizational needs is its own reward. 

BerryDunn’s healthcare compliance team incorporates deep, hands-on knowledge with industry best practices to help your organization manage compliance and revenue integrity risks. Learn more about BerryDunn’s team and services. 

Article
Compliance policies: Are we having fun yet?

The FDIC's Quarterly Banking Profile for quarter two 2025 reports the performance for the 3,982 community banks evaluated. Here are the key highlights: 

Note: Graphs are for all FDIC-insured institutions unless the graph indicates it is only for FDIC-insured community banks. 

Financial Performance 

  • Quarterly net income rose by $842.9 million (12.5%) from the previous quarter to $7.6 billion, with 73.4% of community banks reporting an increase. 

  • Pretax return on assets increased to 1.33%, up 15 basis points quarter over quarter and 19 basis points year over year. 

  • Net interest margin rose to 3.62%, up 16 basis points from the prior quarter and 32 basis points year over year.

Costs and Efficiency

  • Noninterest expense increased by $612.7 million (3.5%) from the previous quarter and has increased 6.5% year over year. 

  • Provision expenses increased by 29.2% quarter over quarter and have increased 47.7% year over year, signaling growing concern over potential credit losses. 

  • Efficiency ratio declined to 62.95%, down 75 basis points from the prior quarter, indicating better cost control relative to revenue.

Loan and Deposit Trends 

  • Loan and lease balances increased by $32.3 billion (1.7%) quarter over quarter and 4.9% year over year, led by nonfarm nonresidential CRE and 1–4 family residential loans. 

  • Domestic deposits rose 0.1% quarter over quarter and 2.9% year over year, with stronger growth in noninterest-bearing than interest-bearing accounts. 

  • Nearly three-fourths (73.4%) of community banks reported loan growth, and half reported deposit growth during the quarter. 

Asset Quality

  • Past-due and nonaccrual loans (PDNA) decreased 6 basis points to 1.27%, mainly driven by 1–4 residential real estate, farm loans, and CRE loans. 

  • Net charge-off ratio increased 3 basis points from the prior quarter to 0.19%, rising above the pre-pandemic average of 0.15%. 

  • Reserve coverage ratio continued to decline to 163.4%, indicating that allowance growth lagged increases in noncurrent loan balances.

Capital and Structural Stability

  • Capital ratios improved modestly across the board: CBLR rose to 14.10%, and the leverage capital ratio increased to 11%. 

  • Unrealized losses on securities fell by $1.7 billion (3.8%) from the prior quarter to $41.3 billion total. 

  • Community bank count declined by 38 during the quarter due to mergers, transitions, and one failure. 

Conclusion and Outlook 

The second quarter of 2025 showed continued momentum for community banks with higher net interest income increasing net income throughout the industry. Further, net interest margin increased 32 basis points from the previous year. However, challenges persist for the industry as non-interest and provision expenses increased during the quarter. Even with past-due and nonaccrual loans on the decline, net charge-off ratios increased slightly as well. With worsening economic conditions, financial institutions are starting to feel the pressure, and there is the expectation that ACL levels will increase. This is starting to be seen in ACL levels, as noted above, with provision expense increasing nearly 48% year over year. Although the magnitude of the increase and the need for an increase in reserve levels altogether can be significantly impacted by institution-specific circumstances, there is an expectation that these increases will continue for the time being. 

As we march through the second half of 2025, community banks should remain attentive to a shifting regulatory environment, particularly on the impacts of tariffs and the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA) and how these changes will affect borrowers. The FDIC also proposed raising several key regulatory thresholds, including those that determine which institutions must comply with Part 363’s audit and internal control requirements. In this article, we provide additional information on the FDIC’s proposal. Furthermore, the United States took a historic step in digital finance on July 18, 2025, when President Donald Trump signed the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for US Stablecoins (GENIUS) Act into law. This legislation introduces the first comprehensive federal framework for payment stablecoins and could potentially have significant implications on the banking industry. In this article, we take a deeper dive into the GENIUS Act and its potential impacts on community banks.  

So, to say there are a lot of moving pieces currently would be an understatement. BerryDunn has a Federal Impacts page, where we are frequently posting updates on the federal landscape. Check out this page for timely information that may impact your institution or your institution’s borrowers. 

Article
FDIC Issues its Second Quarter 2025 Quarterly Banking Profile

This article is for hospital CFOs, directors of reimbursement, and reimbursement managers. 

When it comes to Medicare reimbursement, the hospital Area Wage Index (AWI) may be one of the most important and often overlooked factors influencing your bottom line. This complex formula adjusts prospective payment rates based on regional labor costs and is calculated using data you submit, meaning small reporting decisions can lead to major financial impacts. Hospitals that fully understand how the AWI works and take a proactive approach to managing their data can optimize their Medicare revenue and strengthen long-term financial stability. This article breaks down how the wage index is calculated and offers practical strategies to help you avoid common pitfalls, support audit readiness, and take full advantage of this critical reimbursement mechanism. 

What is the hospital AWI and how is it calculated? 

Developed by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), the hospital AWI is used to adjust Medicare payments to short-term, acute care hospitals under the Prospective Payment System (PPS) to account for geographic differences in hospital labor costs. It compares the average hourly wages of PPS hospitals in a specific labor market area to the national average. Essentially, the AWI enables hospitals in higher-wage areas to receive more reimbursement to reflect their higher costs, while those in lower-wage areas receive less.  

Updated annually, the AWI is calculated for each specific labor market area defined by Core-Based Statistical Areas (CBSA) as established by the US Office of Management and Budget (OMB). To calculate the AWI, CMS determines the average hourly wage from aggregated hospital data for each CBSA and compares it to the national average. For example, if a CBSA has an average hourly wage of $50 and the national average is $40, the AWI would be 1.25. This factor is applied to the labor-related portion of Medicare’s hospital payment rates to ensure more equitable reimbursement across regions with varying labor costs.   

The wage index is derived from data reported by all PPS hospitals located within each CBSA, including data from annual Medicare cost reports and occupational mix surveys completed every three years. The hospital-reported data is audited, including review of payroll records, contracts, invoices for contracted labor, and other wage documentation to validate amounts reported. As such, there is a four-year delay from the reporting of wage data in cost reports to the Federal Fiscal Year (FFY) that the wage data is used to calculate the AWI. For example, the Medicare hospital AWI used to establish prospective payments for the FFY 2026 is based on hospital data from fiscal years beginning during the FFY 2022.  

The following chart, which includes data from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Fiscal Year 2025 Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) Prospective Payment System (PPS) Final Rule, illustrates the significant impact that the wage index factor has on hospital reimbursement. 

Strategic considerations for hospitals 


Accuracy of submitted data 
CMS scrutinizes wage index data with a high level of detail. Inaccurate or inconsistent reporting can result in reimbursement reductions or even penalties. Errors may stem from incorrect wage classifications, exclusion of eligible labor costs, or misalignment between cost report data and payroll records. Hospitals must ensure that their Medicare cost report and occupational mix survey submissions are complete, clearly documented, and compliant with CMS guidance. Regular internal reviews and cross-checks between finance and HR departments can reduce the risk of discrepancies and support a smoother audit process. 

Strategy tip: Establish a wage index review team with finance, reimbursement, and HR representation to ensure consistency and defensibility across all submissions. 

Occupational mix factor 
The occupational mix survey is required every three years and has a multiyear impact on the wage index. It adjusts for differences in staffing models among hospitals, particularly the proportion of higher-paid professionals like RNs compared to lower-paid roles such as LNAs. Even if your total wages remain constant, a change in your occupational mix can significantly alter your wage index and, by extension, your reimbursement. 

Strategy tip: If you've recently undergone staffing changes, make sure these are accurately reflected and that you’ve retained the documentation to support the reported mix.  

Contract labor reporting 
The rise in contract and traveler staffing has introduced new complexity to wage index reporting. CMS requires hospitals to include contract labor costs that are for direct patient care services, but only when wages and hours are clearly documented and the reported costs are only related to labor (not overhead, travel, etc.). Missing or incomplete contractor data can lead to an underreported wage index, which may reduce reimbursement. Many hospitals unintentionally leave out valid contract labor costs because of poor tracking or vendor relationships that don’t provide sufficient detail. 

Strategy tip: Work with your contracted staffing vendors to ensure all contracts and invoices separate wage related rates and hours from non-wage-related cost (travel, housing, administrative fees, etc.). Develop internal controls to flag and track qualifying contract labor throughout the year, not just at cost reporting time. 

Appeal and correction opportunities 
Each year, CMS publishes a preliminary wage index in the Inpatient Prospective Payment System (IPPS) rulemaking process, followed by a correction and appeals window. Hospitals have a narrow opportunity to review, identify errors, and file appeals or correction requests, but many miss this window due to resource constraints or lack of awareness. These opportunities can help recover significant underpayments if discrepancies are discovered. 

Strategy tip: Mark your calendar for the CMS wage index correction deadlines (typically late summer or early fall) and assign someone to monitor the release of proposed rules. Establish a process for reviewing CMS-calculated wage index factors against your internal expectations to quickly identify inconsistencies. 

Geographic reclassification opportunities 
If your hospital is in a lower-wage CBSA but competes in a higher-wage labor market (or is on the border of one), you may be eligible to apply for a wage index reclassification through the Medicare Geographic Classification Review Board (MGCRB). This allows hospitals to be reclassified into a nearby CBSA with higher average wages, potentially increasing your Medicare reimbursement. 

The application must demonstrate that the hospital meets specific criteria related to proximity, commuting patterns, and wage comparability. While the process is data-intensive and must be initiated well in advance (typically by September 1 for the following federal fiscal year), a successful reclassification can yield substantial reimbursement gains. 

Strategy tip: Evaluate your geographic and wage positioning annually. Even if you haven't qualified in the past, changes in market conditions or CMS rules may make you newly eligible. BerryDunn can assist with a feasibility analysis and guide you through the MGCRB application process. 

We’re here to help 

The hospital wage index is complex and reporting wage data is more than a compliance requirement; it’s a strategic lever that can influence millions in Medicare reimbursement. At BerryDunn, our reimbursement specialists can help you: 

  • Validate and optimize your wage index data submissions 
  • Prepare for audits, respond to inquiries, and assist with disputes 
  • Complete the occupational mix survey accurately and efficiently 
  • Analyze trends and opportunities in your wage index factors 
  • Identify opportunities for reclassification  
  • Monitor CMS rule changes that impact your hospital’s reimbursement 

To learn more about how we can help your hospital make the most of the wage index, please contact our reimbursement consulting services team.  

Article
Understanding hospital AWI's impact on Medicare reimbursement