Skip to Main Content

insightsarticles

The people component: Why higher education institutions should focus on staff when implementing an ERP system

11.20.17 /

The relationship between people, processes, and technology is as elemental as earth—and older than civilization. From the first sharpened rock to the Internet of Things, the three have been crucially intertwined and interdependent. There would have been no Industrial Revolution, for instance, without entrepreneurs who developed new tools to facilitate new manufacturing methods.

Of course, the increasing complexity of processes and the rapid innovations in technology tend to eclipse the present role that people play in progress. On the surface the trend seems understandable, even reasonable, when it comes to implementing a new Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) system. Implementing a new ERP system is one of the most daunting projects an institution can undertake. Some sobering statistics—over 70% of all implementations take longer than planned, while over 50% go over budget—illustrate why many institutions focus on selecting the right ERP model and purchasing the right software. This is important, yet there are two excellent and connected reasons why your institution should focus on the “people component” of an ERP implementation.

Reason #1: The Technology is Tenable

Companies have improved and vetted ERP systems over time, so that today there’s little chance your institution will purchase poorly designed ERP software. And you have multiple options. For example, you could pursue a hosted ERP model in which a data center houses your ERP system, or a Software as a Service (SaaS) model, in which a third party administers your ERP software. These options help minimize hardware implementation, maintenance, and incomplete attempts at full system utilization—which in turn saves you time, money, and headaches.

In short: You won’t have to bear the full brunt of the tech burden, and the software and hardware you purchase should work. This enables you to concentrate on the people component of the system.

Reason #2: People Propel the Processes

A higher education institution can optimize an ERP system to complete countless processes: automating registration, onboarding staff, processing financial aid, improving self-service capabilities, simplifying record-keeping, etc. Yet a system can’t do all this on its own (not yet, at least). People—both functional and IT staff—propel these processes. For this to happen, your institution needs to secure buy-in and equip people with vision, training, and resources.

People are wary of ERP projects, for good reason. When an institution decides to tackle an ERP implementation the onus often falls on already busy staff, some of whom may rather find a new career than manage a new system implementation. Your staff and their institutional knowledge are your greatest assets. It is important to empower staff to define how future-state business processes should work—and for you to remember that a common reason for ERP implementation failure is lack of engagement. Sometimes, those at the executive level make decisions without adequate input from the people who actually do the work. You will need to sharpen your “people skills” in order to educate stakeholders on the value of a new ERP system, and how the software will make their day-to-day roles and responsibilities more efficient and effective. To ensure that staff have the bandwidth to engage in this change, it is advisable to provide backfill for key administrative functions.

Designing business processes of a future-state system is arguably the most challenging part of an ERP implementation. Often, stakeholders don’t understand the new functionality that a future system can offer because they have only used the prior system. It is important to engage the ERP vendor early and educate your staff to ensure that they understand the possibilities when designing future-state processes.

Once you have designed processes, training should take center stage. And once again, people play a pivotal role in this process. Modern ERP systems usually require staff to fundamentally conduct business differently; this can require training not only on the new system, but also on other foundational technologies (e.g., the office suite) not relied upon before. It is important to identify these needs and incorporate them into your institution’s training plan up front.

An effective training plan needs to balance multiple types of training, ranging from formal classroom sessions to online learning and train-the-trainer sessions. Tech-savvy staff will be able to train other staff in using the new ERP system, which will not only increase the skill sets of said staff, but will also help them better understand how their roles fit within the larger picture of the institution. This, in turn, will organically improve communication and workflow, as well as lead to more collaboration and teamwork. The result: positive institution-wide change.

Moving Forward

Think about your institution’s focus when implementing a new ERP system—and be aware of the benefits that it could have for your staff, your students, and your bottom line. You will face other ERP-related challenges, such as selecting the right third-party vendor and facilitating change management. If you’d like to discuss some strategies for tackling these challenges, this process is easy—just send me an email.

Read this if you are interested in artificial intelligence (AI).

Everyone is talking about AI right now. With the technology accelerating so fast, companies and individuals are struggling to figure out the impacts: Will it be helpful for businesses? Will it be harmful for employees? Will it change the way we work? 

The thought leaders at BerryDunn have been exploring the technology and ways it may benefit our clients moving forward—both for accounting services and for broader consulting services. Here are five reasons we're optimistic about the future of AI in business. 

  1. AI has the potential to complete menial, time-consuming, and error-prone tasks faster and more accurately.
    BerryDunn’s Kathy Parker, Practice Leader for the firm’s Outsourced Accounting Group, recently shared her thoughts with MassCPAs, stating that “Our approach to clients has always been to act as their consultant and advisor, and AI won't change that. What we are starting to see is that AI software has the potential to reduce the manual work we do, which will free up time so we can do what we do best. I expect that AI will start to take care of things more reliably like automatic scanning, basic tax preparation, and some functions that take up a lot of staff time.” 
  2. AI may free up resources so businesses can be more strategic.
    AI can help complete time-consuming tasks, saving time and staff resources to focus on more strategic initiatives. Parker is excited to think about adding more value to her clients by providing more strategic planning, benchmarking, and advisory services that will contribute to their success. She shared that “Clients are starting to recognize that AI can reduce the burden on accountants, and they're beginning to expect more from us. They don't just want our calculations, they want our expertise, and that's fantastic. Clients want to know how they compare with their competitors, and they want to know how to be proactive about their growth. They want dashboards to be able to easily see where they stand and they're looking for more sophisticated deliverables.”
  3. AI could reduce the price of some services. 
    Parker also shared her view of how AI may affect prices for services such as tax and accounting. “Businesses may also expect to see a different fee schedule, given the potential reduced workload that AI could bring. Of course, that reduced workload will allow service providers to raise the bar in other, potentially more significant, areas of their business.”
  4. AI could improve decision making for businesses.
    Tucker Cutter, a Senior Manager with BerryDunn’s higher education consulting team, believes that AI has the potential to significantly improve decision making for any business. His work focuses on the nexus of technology and people, helping higher ed institutions manage large-scale digital transformation projects. “I’m looking forward to seeing how AI will help us provide high quality decision-making guidance through enhanced data analysis and predictive analytics,” he shared. Once tools have been vetted and tested to prove their accuracy and reliability, AI has the potential to analyze data much faster than could be done manually by humans.
  5. Clarity on the best use cases for AI will emerge.
    If you’re not inclined to be an early adopter, know that you’re not alone. Just as with any other technological revolution, there are still a lot of unknowns. It makes sense to be cautious, especially when you’re dealing with sensitive data. As the dust settles, you’ll be able to learn from the experience of early adopters about what works and what doesn’t. At BerryDunn, our consultants are keeping an eye on the technology and how it may impact processes, systems, and outcomes. 

    Cutter shared his approach to staying current on AI technologies so he can advise his clients, stating that “We need to understand how to use these platforms and tools as well as stay well-versed in AI/technology governance strategies. For the good of our clients, we are still responsible for keeping data strategy at the forefront even if it’s not top-of-mind for our clients.” Clarity won’t emerge overnight, but in the coming months and years, we’re confident that a healthy balance between what’s best for business and what’s best for people will be possible. 
Article
Five reasons to be optimistic about AI: Perspectives from consulting and accounting

Read this if you are planning or are involved in an Enterprise Resource Planning or Student Information System implementation.

Trends in the Enterprise Resource Planning/Student Information System (ERP/SIS) marketplace have seen the emergence of vendors offering full-suite solutions, often supplemented by third-party systems and applications to meet functional needs. Institutions seeking to modernize their systems are now faced with a smorgasbord of software options that can be challenging to evaluate effectively. 

Institutions have the opportunity to reconsider traditional approaches to enterprise systems and implementations based on individual needs and circumstances. While ERP/SIS vendors will continue to provide full-suite solutions for student, HR, and financial operations, institutions can also choose to implement software from multiple vendors best suited for each of these functional areas. 

Moving to a single enterprise-wide system represents a tremendous amount of change. Likewise, implementing and utilizing multiple vendors’ enterprise solutions requires robust integration and data management strategies. The risk of resistance to change by people is significant, regardless of the approach your institution takes to an enterprise system implementation. 

How you address that risk can make all the difference between an effective implementation and a challenging one. Prosci® has a risk assessment tool that looks at two questions you can answer to address change management on the project: 

  • The scope of the change. Is the change small, incremental, or large and disruptive? 
  • The culture of the institution (organizational attributes). Is your institution ready for change or is it change resistant?

Based on the answers to these two questions, you can plot a course for your change management based on whether the change is high, medium, or low risk. 

ERP/SIS implementation risks to address

  1. Complex data migration and integration 
    Higher education technology environments typically involve vast amounts of data from various sources, systems, and applications. Migrating and integrating this data into a new ERP/SIS can be challenging, especially if the data is inconsistent, outdated, or stored in multiple formats. Data quality issues, data loss, or incorrect data mapping present high risks to the project's success from a change perspective during and after implementation.
  2. Resistance to change 
    Higher education institutions often have established processes, workflows, and a culture that may be resistant to change. Faculty, staff, and administrators may be accustomed to legacy systems and may resist adopting new technologies and processes.
     
    Overcoming this resistance and effectively managing change is critical for the success of an ERP/SIS implementation and requires institutions to understand their culture and personal acceptance to change. How do employees remember past changes? How adept is your management team at leading through change? 

    While the scope of the project is often front of mind, leaders may overlook these very important aspects of your culture. 

    In our experience, many institutions have cultures that are change-resistant, particularly if their workforce has been in place for a long time and has not replaced enterprise systems recently.
    Many people in your institution may only know the way they have always done things and may not have had exposure to another ERP/SIS system. This sets people up to be inherently nervous and even fearful of what a new system may mean for their day-to-day work and job security.
  3. Configuration and scope creep
    ERP/SIS implementations can be highly configurable to meet the specific needs of the institution. However, excessive configurations and integrations can lead to scope creep, where the project becomes more complex and costly than initially planned. 

    Balancing configuration with data management and budgetary needs and timelines is a significant challenge. Additionally, extensive configuration can lead to long-term maintenance challenges and software updates becoming difficult. 

    Over the course of an ERP/SIS implementation, these efforts can lead to change saturation, which Prosci® defines “as disruptive changes exceed your capacity to adopt them.” For higher education, the last three years have been a lesson in extreme change saturation. People are tired, burned out, and ready for more stability and less change.

Mitigating the risks of an ERP/SIS implementation

When you combine a complex technology environment, change-resistant culture, and significant scope, you have created an environment that makes it very challenging to implement a new ERP/SIS. As a senior leader about to embark on an ERP/SIS project, what should you do? 

  1. Start change management now 
  2. Select an active project sponsor
  3. Build an effective leadership team 
  4. Enable Data Governance
  5. Be an active and visible leadership team 
  6. Identify and engage supervisors and influencers
  7. Use vendor backlog to start change management sooner
  8. Monitor your change management activities carefully and repeat the processes that prove most effective
  9. Celebrate early and often

If you have questions about your specific situation or want to know more about change management, please contact our Higher Education team. We’re here to help.

Article
Higher education: Managing risk and change in ERP/SIS implementation